Preview

Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials

Advanced search

A method for determination of the boundaries of the stage of steady fatigue crack growth and parameters of Paris equation

https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2019-85-9-66-74

Abstract

A method and procedures for determining the boundaries of the second stage of the kinetic crack resistance diagram or fracture toughness kinetic diagram, sample formation within the aforementioned boundaries and determination of the parameters С and n of the Paris equation from the sample are presented. The necessity of developing the method is attributed to the lack of rules and procedures for accurate determination of the boundaries of the second stage in the current standards and regulatory document (RD). The proposed method provides a given accuracy of determination of the number of cycles corresponding to the length of the fatigue crack at the upper boundary of the second stage obtained by numerical integration of the Paris equation with the found values of the parameters С and re. The developed method is based on the application of two criteria R2 and %. Statistical criterion R2 characterizes a degree of deviation of the experimental data from the linear fragment of the kinetic fracture toughness diagram. Parametric criterion у specifies the level of accuracy of the parameters С and re of the Paris equation. This level is set through a comparative evaluation of the experimental and calculated crack length I and the number of cycles N, obtained by integration of the Paris equation within the specified lower and upper limits of the interval of the stable growth of fatigue crack. Application of the method is shown by the example of the experimental data obtained when testing samples of VT9 titanium alloy, deformable nickel alloy EI437BU and granular nickel alloy EP741NP (granules up to 140 pm) at room and elevated temperatures. Application of the method indicates that the experimental and calculated curves "I - N" obtained by numerical integration of the Paris equation differ by less than the specified value of the criterion X ^ 3%, in contrast to the results obtained in accordance to the recommendations of the regulatory documents.

About the Authors

E. R. Golubovskiy
Central Institute of Aviation Motors
Russian Federation

Evgeny R. Golubovskiy

Aviamotornaya ul, 2, Moscow, 111116



M. E. Volkov
Central Institute of Aviation Motors
Russian Federation

 Mikhail E. Volkov

Aviamotornaya ul, 2, Moscow, 111116



N. M. Emmausskiy
Central Institute of Aviation Motors
Russian Federation

 Nikolay M. Emmausskiy 

Aviamotornaya ul, 2, Moscow, 111116



References

1. Makhutov N. A., Moskvichev V. V, Morozov E. M., Goldshtein R. V. Unification of the methods of testing construction materials for crack resistance: history of the problem and formation of the regulatory structure / Zavod. Lab. Diagn. Mater. 2017. Vol. 83. N 10. E 41 - 54 [in Russian].

2. Makhutov N. A., Moskvichev V. V, Morozov E. M., Goldshtein R. V Unification of computation and experimental methods of testing for crack resistance: development of the fracture mechanics and new goals / Zavod. Lab. Diagn. Mater. 2017. Vol. 83. N 10. E 55 - 64 [in Russian].

3. Shvechkov E. I. Experience of application of foreign standards when testing semi-finished products aerospace / Tekhnol. Legk. Splavov. 2007. N 4. E 38 - 52 [in Russian].

4. OST 1 021927-90. "Metals. Method of determining the rate of growth of fatigue cracks in the test with constant amplitude load». — Moscow: Izd. VILS, 1990. — 68 p. [in Russian].

5. ASTM E-647-15el. "Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates". ASTM International. West Conshohocken. PA. USA, 2015. — 45 p. www.astm.org.

6. RD 50-345-82. "Methodical instructions. Calculations and strength tests. Methods of mechanical testing of metals. Determination of fracture toughness characteristics under cyclic loading". — Moscow: Izd. standartoy, 1983. — 95 p. [in Russian].

7. Potapov S. D., Perepelitsa D. D. Processing technique for experimental data of crack growth at stable amplitude of loading / Vestn. MAI. 2012. Vol. 19. N 2. E 94 - 100 [in Russian].

8. Golubovsky E. R., Volkov M. E., Perevozov A. S., Emmausskiy N. M. Estimation of the characteristics of the rate and interval of stable fatigue crack growth in heat-resistant Nickel deformable and granular alloys / Deform. Razrush. Mater. 2015. N 6. E 43 - 48 [in Russian].

9. Lvovskiy E. N. Statistical methods of constructing empirical formulas. — Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1982. — 224 p. [in Russian].

10. Mashine building (Encyclopedia). Section II "Materials in engineering", Vol. II-3 "Non-ferrous metals and alloys. Composite metal materials". — Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 2001. — 880 p. [in Russian].

11. Vasilev B. E., Magerramova L. A., Kolotnikov M. E., Golubovskiy E. R., Volkov M. E. Databank CIAM on constructional durability of materials / Trudy MAI. 2017. Issue 96. http://tradymai.ra/published.php?ID=85876 [in Russian].


Review

For citations:


Golubovskiy E.R., Volkov M.E., Emmausskiy N.M. A method for determination of the boundaries of the stage of steady fatigue crack growth and parameters of Paris equation. Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials. 2019;85(9):66-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2019-85-9-66-74

Views: 925


ISSN 1028-6861 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0187 (Online)