|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Study of the parameters of acoustic emission transducers taking into account the influence of the acoustic-electronic channel and calibration conditions
https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2022-88-2-30-39
Abstract
Acoustic emission transducers (AET) with piezoelectric cells converting acoustic signals into electric ones, are the most important components of the channel for transmitting information about the parameters of acoustic emission (AE) sources. The main AET parameters are determined by different calibration techniques, but the shape of amplitude-frequency characteristics (AFC) largely depends on the calibration method which significantly complicate the choice of AET for control. We present the results of studying the AET parameters taking into account the role of the acoustic-electronic channel and calibration conditions. It is shown that the most complete data on the AET properties are contained in the impulse response, which should be used to measure the AET parameters. In this case, the AFC is of secondary importance. It is preferable to calibrate the AET using longitudinal waves at normal incidence of the wave on the AET (basic scheme). The results obtained can be used when selecting methods of calibration of working transducers used for diagnostics of industrial objects.
About the Authors
A. A. Sazonov
GIAP-DISTtsentr
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandr A. Sazonov
4, bldg. 4, proezd Serebryakova, Moscow, 129343
V. I. Shelobkov
GIAP-DISTtsentr
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valery I. Shelobkov
4, bldg. 4, proezd Serebryakova, Moscow, 129343
V. I. Ivanov
NIIIN MNPO Spektr
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valery I. Ivanov
35, bldg. 1, ul. Usacheva, Moscow, 119048
References
1. Ivanov V. I., Barat V. A. Acoustic-emission diagnostics. — Moscow: Spektr, 2017. — 368 p. [in Russian].
2. Klyukin I. I., Kolesnikov A. E. Acoustic measurements in shipbuilding. — Leningrad: Sudostroenie, 1982. — 256 p. [in Russian].
3. Physical Acoustics. — Moscow: Mir, 1966. — 592 p. [in Russian].
4. Ivanov V. I. Electrical equivalent circuit and the input impedance of a piezoelectric transducer with internal losses / Defektoskopiya. 1982. N 8. P. 14 – 18 [in Russian].
5. Ultrasonics. Small Encyclopedia. — Moscow: Sovetskaya éntsiklopediya, 1979. — 400 p. [in Russian].
6. Hamtad M. A. Re-examination of NIST acoustic emission absolute sensor calibration. Part II. Finite element modeling of acoustic emission signal from glass capillary fracture / J. Acoustic Emission, 2011. Vol. 29. P. 175 – 183.
7. Viktorov I. A. Physical Bases of Application of Ultrasonic Waves of Rayleigh and Lamb in Technique. — Moscow: Nauka, 1996. — 169 p. [in Russian].
8. Ono K., Cho H., Matsuo T. New Characterization Methods of AE Sensors / J. Acoustic Emission. 2010. Vol. 28. P. 256 – 277.
9. McLaskey G. C., Glaser S. D. Acoustic Emission Sensor Calibration for Absolute Source Measurements / J. Nondestruct. Eval. 2012. Vol. 31. DOI: 10.1007/s10921-012-0131-2
10. Vallen H., Vallen J., Fokker J. A simple method to compare the sensitivity of different AE sensors for tank floor testing / Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Acoustic Emission ICAE-6. — The Acoustic Emission Working Group and Acoustic Emission Group, 2007. P. 253 – 258.
11. Ono K. Through-Transmission Characteristics of AE Sensor Couplants / J. Acoustic Emission. 2017. Vol. 34. P. 1 – 11.
12. Baskakov S. I. Radio Engineering Circuits and Signals. — Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 2000. — 462 p. [in Russian].
13. Sazonov A. A., Shelobkov V. I., Ivanov V. I. The influence of the acoustic-electronic channel on the parameters of the acoustic emission pulse / Kontrol’. Diagnostika. 2020. Vol. 23. N 6. P. 14 – 23 [in Russian].
14. Ono K. An Experimental Study of Acoustic Emission Waveguides / J. Acoustic Emission. 2017. Vol. 34. P. 12 – 51.
15. Ivanov V. I., Vlasov I. E., Sazonov A. A., Miseiko A. N. On uncorrected problems in acoustic emission / Proc. of the 3rd International Conference «Computer Methods and Inverse Tasks in Nondestructive Testing and Diagnostics». — Moscow: Spektr, 2002 [in Russian].
16. Ono K. Critical examination of ultrasonic transducer characteristics and calibration methods / Res. Nondestr. Eval. 2019. Vol. 30. N 1. P. 1 – 47. DOI: 10.1080/09349847.2017.1375585
Review
For citations:
Sazonov A.A., Shelobkov V.I., Ivanov V.I. Study of the parameters of acoustic emission transducers taking into account the influence of the acoustic-electronic channel and calibration conditions. Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials. 2022;88(2):30-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2022-88-2-30-39
Views:
381
Email this article 