Express X-ray fluorescent analysis of technical-grade tantalum and niobium: from raw materials to products
https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2023-89-6-5-12
Abstract
Determination of impurities in Ta- and Nb-based materials is a necessary operation in supporting technological processes. The existing approaches involve the transfer of a sample into a solution with subsequent isolation of impurities. This procedure is rather complicated and takes a lot of time. For this reason, it is of interest to study the possibilities of direct analysis of solid-phase samples of materials, e.g., X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF). The usual scheme of X-ray fluorescence analysis, which involves the experimental construction of calibration characteristics for each element to be determined, requires using a large number of reference samples containing a rather wide range of impurities. We present the results of preliminary characterization of samples of technical-grade tantalum and niobium and products on their base. It is shown that for starting materials, only a significant absence of impurities can be determined using XPA, but even for sintered niobium hydride and Ta powder, XPA can be used as a method for rapid assessment of the composition. A SPECTROSCAN MAX GVM crystal-diffraction spectrometer can be used for analysis and a standard software that implements the fundamental parameter method (FPA) can be used for calibration. In this case, the obtained values of the content of impurities may differ by 1 – 2 orders of magnitude from the reference values. However, such an accuracy is often enough to correct technological processes. The limits of detecting impurities by XRF in Ta- and Nb-based materials are revealed: for elements determined by K-series (from Ti to Co), the detection limits lie in the range from 30 to 60 ppm, whereas for the elements determined by M-series (Ta) the detection limit is approximately 200 ppm and for L-series (Nb) the detection limit is in the range from 100 to 150 ppm.
About the Authors
L. Yu. MezhevayaRussian Federation
Liliya Yu. Mezhevaya
4, Leninsky prosp., Moscow, 119049
M. N. Filippov
Russian Federation
Mikhail N. Filippov
4, Leninsky prosp., Moscow, 119049
31, Leninsky prosp., Moscow, 119071
O. I. Lyamina
Russian Federation
Olga I. Lyamina
31, Leninsky prosp., Moscow, 119071
G. E. Mar’ina
Russian Federation
Galina E. Mar’ina
31, Leninsky prosp., Moscow, 119071
A. A. Arkhipenko
Russian Federation
Aleksandra A. Arkhipenko
31, Leninsky prosp., Moscow, 119071
V. B. Baranovskaya
Russian Federation
Vasilisa B. Baranovskaya
4, Leninsky prosp., Moscow, 119049
31, Leninsky prosp., Moscow, 119071
References
1. Mosichev V. I., Nikolaev G. I., Kalinin B. D. Metals and alloys. Analysis and research. Methods of atomic spectroscopy. Atomic emission, atomic absorption and X-ray fluorescence analysis: Guide. Vol. 2. — St. Petersburg: NPO «Professional», 2006. — 716 p. [in Russian].
2. Karpov Yu. A., Baranovskaya V. B. Issues of standardization of the methods of chemical analysis in metallurgy / Zavod. Lab. Diagn. Mater. 2019. Vol. 85. N 1. Part II. P. 5 – 14 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.26896/1028-6861-2019-85-1-II-5-14
3. Karpov Yu. A., Baranovskaya V. B. Methods for the analysis of rare and precious metals — ways of development / Analytika. 2019. Vol. 9. N 1. P. 40 – 47 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.22184/2227-572X.2019.09.1.40.47
4. Suvorova D., Khudonogova E., Revenko A. Development of the XRF determination technique for the Ga, Hf, and Ta contents in rare earth ores / Analit. Kontrol’. 2016. Vol. 20. N 4. P. 344 – 354 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.15826/analitika.2016.20.4.009
5. Suvorova D., Khudonogova E., Revenko A. X-ray fluorescence determination of Cs, Ce, Nd, and Ta concentrations in rocks of various composition / X-Ray Spectrom. 2017. Vol. 46. N 3. P. 200 – 208. DOI: 10.1002/xrs.2747
6. Losev N. F. Quantitative X-ray fluorescent analysis. — Moscow: Nauka, 1969. — 336 p. [in Russian].
7. Revenko A. G. X-ray spectral fluorescence analysis of natural materials. — Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1994. — 264 p. [in Russian].
8. Zhizhin L. P., Kalinin B. D., Liunski A. V., et al. X-ray fluorescence spectrometers «Spectroscan Maks». Analytical parameters / Analit. Kontrol’. 2002. Vol. 6. N 4. P. 463 – 469 [in Russian].
9. Borkhodoev V. Ya. About a correlation between the limits of detection and determination in X-ray fluorescence analysis / J. Anal. Chem. 2015. Vol. 70. N 11. P. 1307 – 1312. DOI: 10.1134/S106193481509004X
10. Borkhodoev V. Ya. About the limit of detection in X-ray fluorescence analysis / J. Anal. Chem. 2014. Vol. 69. N 11. P. 1041 – 1046. DOI: 10.1134/S1061934814110021
11. Sherman J., Winifred J. M. Adjustment of an Inverse Matrix Corresponding to Changes in the Elements of a Given Column or a Given Row of the Original Matrix / Ann. Math. Stat. 1950. Vol. 21. N 1. P. 124 – 127. DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177729893
12. Bondarenko A. V., Belonovsky A. V., Katzman Ya. M. Application of fundamental parameter method in X-ray fluorescence Analysis of Pulp Products in Ore Concentration / Gorn. Prom. 2021. N 5 – 2. P. 84 – 88 [in Russian].
13. Mantler M., Willis J., Lachance G., et al. Quantitative analysis / Handbook of Practical X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis, B. Beckhoff, B. Kanngießer, N. Langhoff, R. Wedell, H. Wolff, Eds. — Berlin – Heidelberg: Springer, 2006. P. 309 – 410. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-36722-2_5
14. Borkhodoev V. Ya. X-ray fluorescence analysis of rocks by the method of fundamental parameters. — Magadan: SVKNII FEB RAN, 1999. — 279 p. [in Russian].
15. Rousseau R. Corrections for matrix effects in X-ray fluorescence analysis — A tutorial / Spectrochim. Acta. B. 2006. Vol. 7. P. 759 – 777. DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2006.06.014
Review
For citations:
Mezhevaya L.Yu., Filippov M.N., Lyamina O.I., Mar’ina G.E., Arkhipenko A.A., Baranovskaya V.B. Express X-ray fluorescent analysis of technical-grade tantalum and niobium: from raw materials to products. Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials. 2023;89(6):5-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2023-89-6-5-12