Preview

Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Studying the estimates of gamma distribution parameters

https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2024-90-3-78-88

Abstract

The main goal of the work is to obtain additional information about the experimentally obtained sample with a previously known theoretical distribution, the point estimates of the parameters of which are considered known. At the same time, the laws of distribution of these parameters remain unknown, whereas they could provide a researcher with additional information about both the material and technological processes. Hence, it is necessary to obtain an additional number of samples, which is not always possible experimentally. Here we used data on the service life of cutters (GOST 11.011–83 «Rules for determining estimates and confidence limits for gamma distribution parameters») as an experimental sample. The experimental sample contains the results of 50 measurements. The mean was 57.88 hours CI [50.74:65.01]. The confidence probability is taken to be 0.95. Bootstrap was used as a way to obtain additional samples. The universal mathematical package MATLAB is used in the study. Bootstrap allows generation of a large number of samples that require certain selection rules to be applied to them. The first obvious requirement is the significance of the correlation coefficient of the generated sample with the original one. Even at this stage, the bootstrap showed certain limitations in performing the task set in the study. For 1000 samples generated by the standard bootstrap routine, the mean for the population of all mean bootstrap samples was 57.80 hours, and the confidence interval was [50.59:58.08]. The result is good. Though the nonparametric hypothesis regarding an agreement between the bootstrap samples for the gamma distribution and the parameters characteristic of the original experimentally obtained sample was not rejected, the statistically significant correlation coefficient was observed only for 29 bootstrap samples. As a result of meeting these obvious requirements, less than 3% of the generated bootstrap samples remained for further consideration. This fact requires the introduction of additional conditions when using the bootstrap to obtain samples that are close to the original experimental sample, which can be rather specific. To determine the parameters of the gamma distribution for bootstrap samples, the method of moments and the one-step method were used.

About the Author

S. M. Shebanov
ZAO «LEKIS»
Russian Federation

Sergey M. Shebanov

31, Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115409



References

1. Orlov A. I. On the real possibilities of Bootstrap as a statistical method / Industr. Lab. 1987. Vol. 53. N 10. P. 82 – 85 [in Russian].

2. Orlov A. I. Change of paradigms in applied statistics / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2021. Vol. 87. N 7. P. 6 – 7 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.26896/1028-6861-2021-87-7-6-7

3. Orlov A. I. Basic requirements for mathematical methods of classification / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2020. Vol. 86. N 11. P. 67 – 78 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.26896/1028-6861-2020-86-11-67-68

4. Orlov A. I. Limit Theorems and Monte Carlo Method / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2016. Vol. 82. N 7. P. 67 – 72 [in Russian].

5. Shebanov S. M., et al. Estimation of the Weibull – Gnedenko Distribution Parameters for the Strength of Single Filaments of Twaron and Taparan Para-Aramid Fibers Using the Bootstrap Method / Fibre Chemistry. 2021. Vol. 53. N 4. P. 277 – 282. DOI: 10.1007/s10692-022-10284-8

6. Petrovich M. L., Davidovich M. I. Statistical estimation and testing of hypotheses on a computer. — Moscow: Finansy i Statistika, 1989. — 191 p. [in Russian].

7. Orlov A. I. Nonparametric point and interval estimation of distribution characteristics / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2004. Vol. 70. N 5. P. 65 – 70 [in Russian].

8. Orlov A. I. Applied statistics. — Moscow: Ékzamen, 2006. — 671 p. [in Russian].

9. Bolshev L. N., Smirnov N. V. Tables of mathematical statistics. 3rd edition. — Moscow: Nauka, 1983. — 416 p. [in Russian].

10. Bondarev B. V. On testing complex statistical hypotheses / Industr. Lab. 1986. Vol. 52. N 10. P. 62 – 63 [in Russian].

11. Orlov A. I. A common mistake when using the Kolmogorov criteria and omega-square / Industr. Lab. 1985. Vol. 51. N 1. P. 60 – 62 [in Russian].

12. Ward J. H., Jr. Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function / Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1963. Vol. 58. N 301. P. 236 – 244. https://iv.cns.iu.edu/sw/ data/ward.pdf (accessed 10.04.2023).

13. Jorque C. M., Bera A. K. A test for normality of observations and regression residuals / International Statistical Review/ Revue Internationale de Statistique. 1987. Vol. 55. N 2. P. 163 – 172. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf& doi=05c1b378c2d19cffaf285392484b1159f782065c (accessed 10.04.2023).

14. Lilliefors H. W. On the Kolmogorov – Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown / Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1967. Vol. 62. N 318. P. 399 – 402. http://www.bios.unc.edu/~mhudgens/bios/662/2008fall/ Backup/ lilliefors1967.pdf (accessed 10.04.2023).

15. Shapiro S. S., Wilk M. B. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples) / Biometrika. 1965. Vol. 52. N 3/4. P. 591 – 611. http://www.bios.unc.edu/~mhudgens/bios/662/2008fall/ Backup/wilkshapiro1965.pdf (accessed 10.04.2023).


Review

For citations:


Shebanov S.M. Studying the estimates of gamma distribution parameters. Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials. 2024;90(3):78-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2024-90-3-78-88

Views: 295


ISSN 1028-6861 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0187 (Online)