Determination of non-metallic inclusions in metal alloys by spark atomic emission spectrometry (review)

A review of publications regarding detection of non-metallic inclusions in metal alloys using optical emission spectrometry with single-spark spectrum registration is presented. The main advantage of the method - an extremely short time of measurement (~1 min) – makes it useful for the purposes of direct production control. A spark-induced impact on a non-metallic inclusion results in a sharp increase (flashes) in the intensities of spectral lines of the elements that comprise the inclusion because their content in the metal matrix is usually rather small. The intensity distribution of the spectral line of the element obtained from several thousand of single-spark spectra consists of two parts: i) the Gaussian function corresponding to the content of the element in a dissolved form, and ii) an asymmetric additive in the region of high intensity values ??attributed to inclusions. Their quantitative determination is based on the assumption that the intensity of the spectral line in the single-spark spectrum is proportional to the content of the element in the matter ablated by the spark. Thus, according to the calibration dependence constructed using samples with a certified total element content, it is possible not only to determine the proportions of the dissolved and undissolved element, but also the dimensions of the individual inclusions. However, determination of the sizes is limited to a range of 1 – 20 µm. Moreover, only Al-containing inclusions can be determined quantitatively nowadays. Difficulties occur both with elements hardly dissolved in steels (O, Ca, Mg, S), and with the elements which exhibit rather high content in the dissolved form (Si, Mn). It is also still impossible to determine carbides and nitrides in steels using C and N lines. The use of time-resolved spectrometry can reduce the detection limits for inclusions containing Si and, possibly, Mn. The use of the internal standard in determination of the inclusions can also lower the detection limits, but may distort the results. Substitution of photomultipliers by solid-state linear radiation detectors provided development of more reliable internal standard, based on the background value in the vicinity of the spectral line. Verification of the results is difficult in the lack of standard samples of composition of the inclusions. Future studies can expand the range of inclusions to be determined by this method.

1. Grigorovich K. V. New Possibilities of Modern Methods for Determination of Gas-forming Impurities in Metals / Zavod. Lab. Diagn. Mater. 2007. Vol. 73. N 1. Part II. P. 23 – 34 [in Russian].

2. Imamura N. PITCON 76, Abstract Proceedings, paper 42, 1976.

3. Slickers K., Gruber J. Spectrometric Determination of Metallic and Non-Metallic Element Amounts in Steel / Stahl Eisen. 1984. Vol. 104. N 6. P. 293 – 298.

4. Falk H., Wintjens P. Statistical evaluation of single sparks / Spectrochim. Acta. Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy. 1998. Vol. 53. N 1. P. 49 – 62.

5. Rosefort M. et al. Determination of TiB~ 2 Inclusions in Al-Billets by Single Spark Emission Spectrometry / Light Metals-Warrendale-Proceedings. — TMS. 2008. Vol. 2008. P. 709.

6. Böhlen J. M. Ultra-fast analysis of micro inclusions in aluminum and its alloys with Thermo Scientific ARL iSpark Metal Analyzers — Standard Inclusion Analysis. Application Note 41248. https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/brochures/OE-AN41248-AluminumSpark-DAT_Al_Standard-0713.pdf (accessed 23.03.18).

7. SPECTRO FOCUS Detection and Analysis of Inclusions Using SPECTROLAB’s Single Spark Evaluation Technology. Spectrolab whitepapers. http://www.spectro.com/products/optical-emis-sion-spectroscopy/spectrolab-metal-analysis (accessed 23.03.18).

8. Bengston A., Didriksson R., Sedlakova M. Development of MVA techniques for quantitative determination of non-metallic inclusions in steels by OES/ PDA [C] / Proc. of 7th International Workshop on Progress in Analytical Chemistry in the Steel and Metal Industries, 2006. P. 213 – 218.

9. Pande M. M. et al. Determination of steel cleanliness in ultra low carbon steel by pulse discrimination analysis-optical emission spectroscopy technique / ISIJ International. 2011. Vol. 51. N 11. P. 1778 – 1787.

10. Janis D. A Study of Different Methods for Inclusion Characterization towards On-line use during Steelmaking: PhD Thesis. — Royal Institute of Technology, 2015.

11. Bengtson A. et al. EUR 25153 — Process based steel cleanliness investigations and rapid metallurgical screening of inclusions by modern PDA techniques (RAMSCI). European commission final report. — Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2012. — 138 p.

12. Whiteside I. R. C. et al. Fast characterisation of steel cleanness by advanced mathematical analysis of spark and laser source optical emission data / EUR. 2006. N 22079.

13. Krebs B. et al. Application of the OES-PDA Measurements to Predict the Macro-Cleanliness of Products Coming from Continuous Casting Machine / Bearing Steel Technologies: Vol. 11, Advances in Steel Technologies for Rolling Bearings. — ASTM International, 2017. P. 421 – 438.

14. Mathy H., Tusset V., Lamberigts M. An evaluation of sulphide inclusion content assessment methods in vacuum-processed steels / 2nd International Congress on the Science & Technology Steelmaking, University of Wales Swansea, UK, 10 – 11 April 2001. P. 374 – 385.

15. Peisakhson I. V. Optics of spectral instruments. 2nd Ed. — Leningrad: Mashinostroenie, 1975. — 312 p. [in Russian].

16. iSpark Spectrometer Description. https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/IQLAAHGABDFAOOMBCM (accessed March 26, 18).

17. Spectrolab Spectrometer Description. http://www.spectro.com/products/optical-emission-spectroscopy/spectrolab-metal-ana-lysis (accessed March 26, 2018).

18. QSG 750-II. Spectrometer Description. https://oblf.de/en/products/spark-spectrometer/qsg-750-ii (accessed March 26, 2018).

19. PDA-8000. Spectrometer Description / Shimadzu company web-site. https://www.shimadzu.ru/pda-8000 (accessed March 26, 2018).

20. Kuss H. M. et al. Comparison of spark OES methods for analysis of inclusions in iron base matters / Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2002. Vol. 374. N 7 – 8. P. 1242 – 1249.

21. Analysis of Iron and Steel by Optical Emission ARL 4460 Metals analyzer. Application Note 41220. http://www.symtek.com/files/editor/files/OE-An%C3%A1lisis%20de%20Hierro%20en%20ARL%204460.pdf (accessed 27.03.18).

22. Thomsen V. Spectrometers for Elemental Spectrochemical Analysis, Part III: Arc/ Spark Optical Emission Spectrometers / Spectroscopy. 2010. http://www.spectroscopyonline.com/spectro- meters-elemental-spectrochemical-analysis-part-iii-arcs-park-optical-emission-spectrometers (accessed 27.03.18).

23. Böhlen J. M., Yellepeddi R. Application of Optical Emission Spectrometry for Combined Quantitative Analysis and Ultrafast Analysis of Non-Metallic Inclusions in Metallurgy / Lit’e Metallurg. 2012. N 1. P. 115 – 120 [in Russian].

24. Bohlen J. M., Vogeli M. Latest developments in inclusions and steel cleanness analysis by OES / Proc. of 7th International Workshop on Progress in Analytical Chemistry in the Steel and Metal Industries, 2006. P. 219 – 223.

25. Bock D. N., Labusov V. A., Zarubin I. A. Determination of Non-Metallic Inclusions in Metal Alloys by Spark Optical Emission Spectrometry / Zavod. Lab. Diagn. Mater. 2015. Vol. 81. N 1. Part II. P. 92 – 97 [in Russian].

26. Bock D. N., Labusov V. A. Means to Lower Non-metallic Inclusions Detection Limit during their Determination in Metal Alloys by Spark Optical Emission Spectrometry / Analit. Kontrol’. 2016. Vol. 20. N 4. P. 286 – 293 [in Russian].

27. Ruuska J., Ollila S., Leiviskä K. The Possibility to Use Optical Emission Spectrometry for Identifying the Amount of Inclusions in Steels / Materials Science Forum. — Trans Tech Publications, 2013. Vol. 762. P. 649 – 655.

28. Boué-Bigne F. et al. EUR 24190 — Development of inclusion reference materials and simultaneous determination of metals and non-metallic inclusions by rapid LIBS analysis in steel samples. — Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010. — 121 p.

29. Tusset V. et al. Cleanness assessment of high quality steels produced by RH treatment / Ironmaking & Steelmaking. 2003. Vol. 30. N 2. P. 142 – 145.

30. Reinholdsson F. et al. A Metallurgical Tool for Rapid Determination of Micro Inclusion Characteristics in Bearingm Steel Production / ISIJ International. 1997. Vol. 37. N 6. P. 637 – 639.

31. Meilland R. Routine optical emission spectrometry methods for rapid assessment of steel cleanness / Research short report, 2006.

32. Li K., Halász E., Böhlen J. M. Ultra fast quantitative analysis of non metallic inclusions in steel / Millenium Steel. 2011. P. 179 – 182.

33. Ebri G. et al. Different steel grades cleanliness evaluation by PDA-OES technique / 21st IAS Steel Conference, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina. 2016. P. 371 – 380.

34. DeHoff R. T., Rhines F. N. Determination of number of particles per unit volume from measurements made on random plane sections: the general cylinder and the ellipsoid / Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME. 1961. Vol. 221. N 5. P. 975 – 982.

35. Underwood E. E. / Quantitative Microscopy // R. T. DeHoff and F. N. Rhines (eds.). — New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968. P. 149 – 200.

36. Karlsson L., Sandström R. Evaluation of three-dimensional size distributions of inclusions / Metallography. 1986. Vol. 19. N 2. P. 143 – 176.

37. Karasev A., Suito H. Analysis of size distributions of primary oxide inclusions in Fe-10 mass Pct Ni-M (M = Si, Ti, Al, Zr, and Ce) alloy / Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B. 1999. Vol. 30. N 2. P. 259 – 270.

38. Takahashi J., Suito H. Evaluation of the accuracy of the three-dimensional size distribution estimated from the Schwartz – Saltykov method / Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2003. Vol. 34. N 1. P. 171 – 181.

39. Hemmerlin M. et al. Application of vacuum ultraviolet laser-induced breakdown spectrometry for steel analysis — comparison with spark-optical emission spectrometry figures of merit / Spectrochim. Acta. Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy. 2001. Vol. 56. N 6. P. 661 – 669.

40. Cabalın L. M., Mateo M. P., Laserna J. J. Large area mapping of non-metallic inclusions in stainless steel by an automated system based on laser ablation / Spectrochim. Acta. Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy. 2004. Vol. 59. N 4. P. 567 – 575.

41. Kuss H. M., Mittelstaedt H., Mueller G. Inclusion mapping and estimation of inclusion contents in ferrous materials by fast scanning laser-induced optical emission spectrometry / J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 2005. Vol. 20. N 8. P. 730 – 735.

42. Boué-Bigne F. Analysis of oxide inclusions in steel by fast laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy scanning: an approach to quantification / Appl. Spectrosc. 2007. Vol. 61. N 3. P. 333 – 337.

43. Bengtson A. Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy compared with conventional plasma optical emission techniques for the analysis of metals-A review of applications and analytical performance / Spectrochim. Acta. Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy. 2017. Vol. 134. P. 123 – 132.