Preview

Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials

Advanced search

PROSPECTS FOR RESEARCH IN IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY OF PRODUCTION MEETINGS

https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2019-85-5-80-86

Abstract

Original approaches to enhancing the efficiency of production meetings are developed. Basic hypothesis and promising lines of research that can promote the efficiency of production meetings are reviewed. A number of Russian and foreign scientific journals mistakenly treat some types of operational meetings as brainstorming although some of the procedures contain no mechanisms inherent in brainstorming, which can thus lead to a confusion with their use. We propose to: 1) take into account the difficulties in identify ing the type of meeting procedure; 2) consider and use the existing procedures, techniques and methods for setting goals by the supervisor and their subsequent adjustment; 3) use the basic decision-making models for enterprises and organizations, i.e., select the most appropriate types of meetings proceeding from their advantages and shortcomings; 4) use the psychology of small groups and methods for stimulating small groups and teams. Avoid spontaneous selection of meeting and choose the best category of meeting proceeding from the advantages and disadvantages of this category of meeting among others. It is recommended to use three kinds of selection tasks in the context of group selection theory (selecting of the best or appropriate single object from the given set): selection of subsets in which all L selected best objects are supposed to be used without dropping out any of them, where L > 1; simultaneous selection of the subsets consisting of a different number of elementary alternatives in which it is supposed to use all the selected best objects without dropping out any of them, including the case when one object is selected and compared (elementary motion); application of the results of interrogative logic. It is necessary to objectify the process of searching for compromises (agreement of opinions) of the participants of the meeting, expressed in various non-verbal types of assessments, i.e., to use a discrete or statistical approach to aligning expert rankings of the participants of the meeting. The novelty of the work is expressed by the fact that for the first time an emphasis has been placed on those areas that are usually not associated with an increase in the efficiency of production meetings. Moreover, the scope of the concept of "meeting" has been narrowed, and a special class of production meetings has been identified and described.

About the Authors

Yu. V. Sidelnikov
Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University)
Russian Federation


A. V. Ruapukhin
Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University)
Russian Federation


References

1. Beer Anthony Stafford. Brain Of The Firm. — London: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, 1972.

2. Panfilova A. E Brainstorms in Group Decision Making. Manual. 2nd edition. — Moscow: Flinta, 2007. — 320 p. [in Russian].

3. Lapygin Yu. N., Krylov V. E., Chernyavskii A. P. Economic Forecasting: Manual. — Moscow: Eksmo, 2009. — 256 p. [in Russian].

4. Sidelnikov Y. V, Saltykov S. A. Forecasting Expert Methods Selection Procedure based on Setting up Correspondence between a Task and a Method / Ekon. Strategii. 2008. N 7. P 102 - 109 [in Russian].

5. Lambing Kelly A. Increasing Meeting Effectiveness for Internal Auditors / The IIA Research Foundation — Donald E. Ricketts Research Award Competition. January. 2008. — 32 p.

6. Potter Claire B. Why Can't We Get Anything Done? How To Run An Effective Meeting. 2010. June 16. https://www.ch.ronicle.com/blognetwork/tenuredradical/2010/06/why-cant-we-getanything- done-how-to

7. Heffernan Virginia. Meet is Murder/ The New York Times Magazine. Feb. 25. 2016.

8. Romano Nicholas C, Nunamaker Jay F. Meeting Analysis: Findings from Research and Practice / Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2001.

9. Jolly Vincent Bagire, Kyogabiirwe Byarugaba Janet. Organizational meetings: management and benefits / Journal of Management Development. 2015. Vol. 34. Issue 8. P 960 -972.

10. Leach Desmond J., Rogelberg Steven G., Warr Peter В., Burnfield Jennifer L. Perceived Meeting Effectiveness: The Role of Design Characteristics / Journal Bussiness Psychology. 2009. N 24. P 65 - 76.

11. Panfilova A. P. Business Communication in Professional Life: Manual. — St. Petersburg: Znanie, 2001. — 496 p. [in Russian].

12. Network Assessment. 2nd edition / Edited D. A. Novikov, A. N. Raikov — Moscow: Egves, 2011. — 166 p. [in Russian].

13. Annotation — Compendium of lectures on 'Managerial Decisions'. https://www.ronl.ru/referaty/raznoe/547600 (accessed 02.05.2018).

14. Incremental model by Ch. Lindblom. https://decision-make.ru/ index.php?action=full article&id=297 (accessed 03.05.2018).

15. Vroom Victor H. Work and Motivation / Revised Edition: Jossey-Bass Classics, 1995. — 331 p.

16. Crozier Michel et Friedberg Erhard. Organizations as Means and Constraints of Collective Action / Warner M. (ed.). Organizational Choice and Constraint. — London: Publishers of Grower Press, Saxon House, 1977.

17. Sidelnikov Yu. V, Minaev E. S. Expert Scenario Forecasting Technique. — Moscow: MAI, 2017. — 232 p. [in Russian].

18. Krichevskiy R. L., Dubovskaya E. M. Social Psychology of Small Group: Manual. — Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2001. — 318 p. [in Russian].

19. Andreeva G. M. Social Psychology. 3rd edition. — Moscow: Nauka, 1994. — 325 p. [in Russian].

20. Vartanyan A. A. Management in Business Environment. — Moscow: Dobroe slovo, 2006. — 288 p. [in Russian].

21. Vartanyan A. A., Sidelnikov Yu. V. The 2nd dimension of Maslow's Hierarchy/ Ekon. Strategii. 2006. N 1. P 116 - 120. [in Russian].

22. Kozyreva N. A. https://wwwtrizland.ru/trizba.php?id=321 (accessed 15.11.2018).

23. Sidelnikov Yu. V, Kalmykov N. S. Methods of formulation of expert problems and their corrections / Ekon. Upravl. Mashinostr. 2017. N 5. P 59 - 64 [in Russian].

24. Belnap N. D., Steel Т. B. The logic of questions and answers.

25. V A. Smirnov, V K. Fin (eds.). — Moscow: Progress, 1981. — 290 p. [in Russian].

26. Kawakita Jiro. Hassoho, 1967. — 202 p.

27. Shiba S. et al. Step by Step KJ Method / COM Document.

28. N 2.

29. Shiba S. et al. Step by Step KJ Method: A Problem Solving Tool for Organizing Qualitative Data. — Center for Quality Management, 1991.

30. Borda J. C. Memoire sur les Elections au Scrutin. Historia de l'Academie Royale des Science, 1781.

31. Condorcet Marquis de. Essai sur PApplication de PAnalyse a la Probabilite des Decisions Rendues a la Pluralite des Voix. Paris, 1785.

32. Arrow K. Social Choice and Individual Values. — N.Y.: Wiley, 1951. Second edition: Yale University Press, 1963. — 124 p.

33. Aizerman M. A., Malishevskii A. V Some aspects of the general theory of choosing the best options / Avtomat. Telemekh. 1981. N 2. P 65 - 83 [in Russian].

34. Aizerman M. A., Aleskerov F. T. Choice of options (fundamentals of theory). — Moscow: Nauka, 1990. — 240 p. [in Russian].

35. Heiner R. A., Packard D. J. A uniqueness result for extending orders; with application to collective choice as inconsistency resolution / Journal of economic theory. 1984. Vol. 32. P 180 -184.

36. Bossert W. On the extension of preferences over a set to the power set; an axiomatic characterization of a quasi-ordering / Journal of economic theory. 1989. Vol. 49. P 84 - 92.

37. Fishburn P. C, LaValle I. H. Binary interaction and subset choice / European journal of operational research. 1996. Vol. 92. P 182 - 192.

38. Podinovskiy V. V Forming a set of several best objects with partial information about preferences / Isk. Intellekt Prin. Resh. 2008. N 4. P 3 - 11 [in Russian].

39. Krylov E. M. Structural Analysis Models, Algorithms and Software for Classification Data Processing in Ranking Environment dedicated to Decision-Making Automation: Author's abstract of Candidate's Thesis. — Kharkov, 1984 [in Russian].

40. GOST 23554.1-79. Product Expert Quality Control Methods. — Moscow: Standard edition, 1980 [in Russian].

41. Sidelnikov Yu. V System Analysis of Expert Forecast Technique. — Moscow: MAI, 2007. — 348 p. [in Russian].

42. Tarasov M. V Methods for Preparation and Holding Production Meetings / ROD 'Za prava voennosluzhashchikh'. 2005. N9. http://voenprav.ru/doc-3266-l.htm (accessed 21.06.2018) [in Russian].


Review

For citations:


Sidelnikov Yu.V., Ruapukhin A.V. PROSPECTS FOR RESEARCH IN IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY OF PRODUCTION MEETINGS. Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials. 2019;85(5):80-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2019-85-5-80-86

Views: 555


ISSN 1028-6861 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0187 (Online)