Comparison of the characteristics of modern aluminum alloys
https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2019-85-7-50-55
Abstract
The results of experimental studies of the static strength, fatigue and crack resistance of modern improved aluminum alloys 1163ATV, 1163RDTV, 1441RT1, 1163T, 1163T7, 1161T, V95ochT2, B96-3pchT12., 1973T2 developed at the All-Russian Scientific Research Institute for Aviation Materials (VIAM, Russia); and 2524-T3, 6013-T6 HDT, 2324-T39, C433-T351, 7055-T7751 developed at ALCOA (USA) are presented. Those materials are used in the construction of modern operated and designed aircraft. The experimental data were obtained in testing standard specimens on electro-hydraulic machines MTS (USA), Instron (Great Britain) and Schenk (FRG). The tested specimens were cut from semi-products manufactured according to serial technologies. The mechanical properties of materials under tension (σb, σ0.2, δ), fatigue characteristics, fatigue crack growth rate, stress crack propagation curves under static loading (R-curves), conditionally critical stress intensity factors are determined according to domestic standards. To ensure high weight efficiency combined with a high resource and high performance characteristics of the aircraft structures, aluminum alloys must have the following set of necessary characteristics: high resistance to variable loads, low rate of fatigue cracks growth, required residual strength, and good corrosion resistance. The obtained results of experimental studies clearly demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of the strength properties of the materials under study. The results of experimental studies provide the possibility to compare the strength properties of the materials under study to optimize their use for the specific zone of the structure and thus increase the life and safety of the aircraft design.
About the Authors
Grigoriy I. NesterenkoRussian Federation
ul. Zhukovskogo, 1, Zhukovskiy, Moscovsksya obl., 140180
Aleksandr V. Kulemin
Russian Federation
ul. Zhukovskogo, 1, Zhukovskiy, Moscovsksya obl., 140180
Anton S. Kim
Russian Federation
ul. Zhukovskogo, 1, Zhukovskiy, Moscovsksya obl., 140180
Valentin N. Basov
Russian Federation
ul. Zhukovskogo, 1, Zhukovskiy, Moscovsksya obl., 140180
Boris G. Nesterenko
Russian Federation
ul. Viktorenko, 7, Moscow, 125319
References
1. Fridlyander I. N. Aluminum alloys in aircraft in the periods 1970 – 2000 and 2001 – 2015 / Tekhnol. Leg. Splavov. 2002. N 4. P. 12 – 17 [in Russian].
2. Nesterenko B. G., Nesterenko G. I. Analysis of requirements on fatigue and damage tolerance for civil transport airplanes / Proc. of the 26th Symposium of the International Committee on Aeronautical Fatigue (ICAF), 1 – 3 June 2011, Montreal, Canada. P. 39 – 59.
3. Basov V. N., Nesterenko B. G., Nesterenko G. I. Destruction of high-strength aluminum alloys / Polet. — Moscow: Mashinostroeniye, 2008. P. 87 – 92 [in Russian].
4. Nesterenko B. G. Crack resistance of cladding materials for the construction of civil aircraft / Nauch. Vestn. MGTU GA. 2010. N 153. P. 7 – 14 [in Russian].
5. Basov V. N., Nesterenko G. I. Strength and fatigue of cladding materials for civil aircraft structures / Nauch. Vestn. MGTU GA. 2010. N 153. P. 15 – 23 [in Russian].
6. Rambabu P., Prasad N. E., Kutumbarao V. V., Wanhill R. J. H. Aluminium Alloys for Aerospace Applications / Aerospace Materials and Material Technologies. Vol. 1 // Prasad N., Wanhill R., eds. — Springerhink, 2017. P. 29 – 52.
7. Giummarra C., Thomas B., Rioja R. J. New Aluminum Lithium Alloys for Aerospace Applications / Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Light Metals Technology. September 24 – 26,2007, Saint-Saveur, Quebec, Canada.
8. Antipov V. V. Metal materials of the new generation for the airframe of promising products of aerospace equipment / Nov. Materialoved. Nauka Tekhn. 2013. N 4. P. 2 – 10 [in Russian].
Review
For citations:
Nesterenko G.I., Kulemin A.V., Kim A.S., Basov V.N., Nesterenko B.G. Comparison of the characteristics of modern aluminum alloys. Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials. 2019;85(7):50-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2019-85-7-50-55