A comparison of standard test methods for determining the laboratory effectiveness of oil spill dispersants: their benefits and drawbacks

A comparison of two standard test methods for determining the laboratory effectiveness of oil spill dispersants — ASTM F2059-17 «Standard Test Method for Laboratory Oil Spill Dispersant Effectiveness Using the Swirling Flask» and ASTM F3251-17 «Standard Test Method for Laboratory Oil Spill Dispersant Effectiveness Using the Baffled Flask» — is presented in this article. It is underlined that ASTM F2059-17 and ASTM F3251-17 are almost identical from the methodological and technical points of view. The main differences lie in specific design features of the applied test vessels and mixing energies created inside them. It is reasonably established that ASTM F2059-17 can be defined as a low-energy, but ASTM F3251-17 — as a high-energy laboratory test method. The specific examples of application of the test methods for determining the effectiveness of commercially available dispersants are given. It is also concluded that both test methods are necessary to apply for a correct understanding of the dispersant effectiveness. Herewith, the results obtained according to ASTM F2059-17 should be conditionally considered as the lower limit and those according to ASTM F3251-17 — the upper limit of effectiveness of the dispersant. Moreover, the use of gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) is emphasized to be sometimes impossible as a recommended in both ASTM F2059-17 and ASTM F3251-17 method for analyzing the oil extracts obtained during the test. The UV spectrophotometry is proposed instead of GC-FID as an alternative. However, its application is possible only after mandatory optimization of the measurement parameters for each specific oil.

1. STO 318.4.02–2005. Oil spill dispersant manual. — St. Petersburg: TsNIIMF, 2005. — 30 p. [in Russian].

2. Stout S. A., Wang Zh. Standard Handbook Oil Spill Environmental Forensics: Fingerprinting and Source Identification. 2nd Edition. — Academic Press, 2016. — 1142 p. DOI: 10.1016/C2015-0-00228-3.

3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). Swirling flask dispersant effectiveness test. Title 40 code of federal regulations, Pt. 300, Appendix C. — Naragansett, RI: 1996, P. 245 – 250.

4. Srinivasan R., Lu Q., Sorial G. A., et al. Dispersant effectiveness of heavy fuel oils using baffled flask test / Environ. Eng. Sci. 2007. Vol. 24. N 9. P. 1307 – 1320. DOI: 10.1089/ees.2006.0245.

5. Appendix A to WSL Report LR 448 (OP) «Specification for oil spill dispersants: The determination of the efficiency index of oil spill dispersants». — Department for the Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, United Kingdom, 2007. — 11 p.

6. Becker K. W., Coker L. G., Walsh M. A. A method for evaluating oil spill dispersants Exxon dispersant effectiveness test (EXDET) / Proc. of Oceans ‘91 (1991, Honolulu, Hawaii). P. 1486 – 1490.

7. Bocard C., Castaing G. Dispersant effectiveness evaluation in a dynamic flow-through system: The IFP dilution test / Oil Chem. Pollut. 1986/1987. Vol. 3. N 6. P. 433 – 444. DOI: 10.1016/S0269-8579(86)80024-7.

8. Mackay D., Szeto F. The laboratory determination of dispersant effectiveness: method development and results / Proc. of International Oil Spill Conference, 1981. Vol. 1981. N 1. P. 11 – 17. DOI: 10.7901/2169-3358-1981-1-11.

9. ASTM F2059-17. Standard Test Method for Laboratory Oil Spill Dispersant Effectiveness Using the Swirling Flask. 2017-04-15. — ASTM, 2017. — 5 p.

10. ASTM F3251-17. Standard Test Method for Laboratory Oil Spill Dispersant Effectiveness Using the Baffled Flask. 2017-04-15. — ASTM, 2017. — 6 p.