Preview

Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Scientific and methodological provision of safety of subsea pipelines with defects using risk criteria

https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2021-87-6-45-53

Abstract

Scientific and methodological aspects of ensuring the safety of offshore subsea pipelines proceeding from the accident risk criteria are considered. A conceptual approach to assessing the defect hazard by risk criteria is formulated. This approach is based on the provisions of modern norms and requirements for the calculation of pipelines. A probabilistic model for assessing the risk of accidents at offshore subsea pipelines is developed with allowance for a random nature of defects and damage from accidents. The criterion conditions for the admissibility of defects in pipelines are formulated. Two conceptual directions for developing a methodological base for calculation of the permissible defects by risk criteria are thus proposed. The first direction is the development of semi-probabilistic calculation procedures using differentiated safety factors, with allowance for the level of the accident risk. The second direction consists in solving the problem of the probability of the pipeline destruction taking into account the restrictions in the form of a given risk value. The probability and scale of accidents are linked by a risk matrix. The calculation methodology was developed using a semi-probabilistic concept for the most typical defects in subsea pipelines. The suitability of the pipeline for operation after in-line diagnostics is determined using a three-level assessment of the permissible size of defects. The first, basic level, determines the permissible size of defects according to the strength criteria for the pipelines exposed to the action of the main loads, i.e., internal overpressure and hydrostatic external pressure. The second, extended level, determines the permissible dimensions of defects based on the strength criteria, taking into account the impact of additional longitudinal and bending loads on pipelines. The third, special level, determines the permissible dimensions of cracks and crack-like defects according to the characteristics of the crack resistance of the pipeline metal. The novelty of the methodology consists in the justification of the safety factors through the levels of failure probabilities corresponding to a given class of damage and losses. A scheme for making decisions on the admissibility of defects by risk criteria has been developed. An example of hazard assessment of defects in subsea pipelines is presented.

About the Authors

N. A. Makhutov
Mechanical Engineering Research Institute of the Russian Acadrmy of Science
Russian Federation

Nikolai A. Makhutov

4, Maly Kharitonievsky per., Moscow, 101000



A. M. Lepikhin
Federal research center for information and computational technologies; NTTs NefteGazDiagnostika
Russian Federation

Anatoly M. Lepikhin

6, prosp. Akad. M. A. Lavrentieva, Novosibirsk, 630090

40/14,4, Nizhnyaya Krasnoselskaya ul., Moscow, 105066



V. V. Leshchenko
NTTs NefteGazDiagnostika
Russian Federation

Viktor V. Leshchenko

40/14,4, Nizhnyaya Krasnoselskaya ul., Moscow, 105066



References

1. Borodavkin P. P. Offshore oil and gas facilities. In 2 parts. Part 1. Design. — Moscow: Nedra-Biznestsentr, 2006. — 555 p. [in Russian].

2. Bay Y., Bay Q. Subsea pipeline design, analysis and installation. — New York: Elsevier, 2014. — 784 p. ISBN: 978-0-12-386888-6.

3. Bay Y., Bay Q. Subsea pipeline integrity and risk management. — New York: Elsevier, 2014. — 405 p. ISBN: 978-0-12-394432-0.

4. State Standard GOST R 54382–2011. Oil and gas industry. Subsea pipeline systems. General technical requirements. — Moscow: Standartinform, 2013. — 274 p. [in Russian].

5. ND 2-020301-005-E. Rules for the classification and construction of subsea pipelines. — St. Petersburg: Rossiiskii morskoi registr sudokhodstva, 2017. — 170 p. [in Russian].

6. Offshore accident and failure frequency data sources-review and recommendations. RR1114. — Derbyshire: HSE Books, 2017. — 54 p.

7. Christou M., Konstantinidou M. Safety of offshore oil and gas operations: lessons from post accidental analysis. Report EUR25646EN, 2012. — 60 p.

8. Arkadov G. V., Getman A. F., Rodionov A. N. Reliability of NPP equipment and pipelines. — Moscow: Énergoatomizdat, 2010. — 423 p. [in Russian].

9. Zainullin R. C., Morozov E. M., Aleksandrov A. A. Criteria for Safe Fracture of Pipeline System Elements with cracks. — Moscow: Nauka, 2005. — 316 p. [in Russian].

10. Gaspariants R. C. Calculation of the strength and durability of pipelines with corrosion defects of metal loss / Neftegaz. Delo. 2008. N 1. P. 34 – 39 [in Russian].

11. Mirzoev A. M. Review of approaches and methods for assessing the technical condition the linear part of gas pipelines / Élektr. Nauch. Zh. «Neftegaz. Delo». 2012. N 4. P. 111 – 123 [in Russian].

12. Timashev S. A., Bushinskaya A. V., Malukova M. G., Poluyan L. V. Integrity and safety of pipeline systems. — Yekaterinburg: UrO RAN, 2013. — 590 p. [in Russian].

13. Leis B. N., Stephens D. R. An Alternative Approach to Assess the Integrity of Corroded Line Pipe. Part II: Alternative Criterion, Proceedings of the Seventh (1997) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Honolulu, USA, 25 – 30 May 1997. P. 635 – 641.

14. DNV-RP-F101. Corroded pipelines. Det Norske Veritas. 2010. — 42 p.

15. ASME B31G. Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. A supplement to ASME B31G code for pressure piping. — New York: American Petroleum Institute, 2009. — 56 p.

16. SINTAP (1999), Structural Integrity Assessment Procedure. Final Revision. EU-Project BE 95-1462. — 231 p.

17. BS7910:2013. Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. — 480 p.

18. OST-23.040.00-KTN-574-06. Trunk oil pipelines. Determination of strength and durability of pipes and welded joints with defects. — Moscow: OAO «AK «Transneft», 2011. 135 p.

19. Ivantsov O. M., Harionovskii V. V., Tchernii V. P. Comparison of calculation methods for trunk pipelines according to the standards of Russia, USA, Canada and European countries. — Moscow: IRTs Gazprom, 1997. — 51 p. [in Russian].

20. Amaya-Gómez R., Sánchez-Silva M., Bastidas-Arteaga E., Schoefs F., Munoz F. Reliability assessments of corroded pipelines based on internal pressure. A review. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01988082.

21. DNVGL-ST-F101. Submarine pipeline systems. Edition October 2017. — 517 p.

22. Makhutov N. A. Safety and Risks: System Research and Development. — Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2017. — 724 p. [in Russian]

23. Lepikhin A., Moskvichev V., Makhutov N. Probabilistic modelling in solving analytical problems of system engineering / Probabilistic modelling in system engineering. — London: IntechOpen, 2018. P. 1 – 22. ISBN 978-1-78923-744-0.

24. Lepikhin A. M., Makhutov N. A., Moskvichev V. V. Chernyaev A. P. Probabilistic risk analysis of technical system designs. — Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2003. — 174 p. [in Russian].

25. ANSI/API 5L. Specification for Line Pipe. — Washington: API Publishing service, 2013. — 192 p.


Review

For citations:


Makhutov N.A., Lepikhin A.M., Leshchenko V.V. Scientific and methodological provision of safety of subsea pipelines with defects using risk criteria. Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials. 2021;87(6):45-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2021-87-6-45-53

Views: 446


ISSN 1028-6861 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0187 (Online)