A technique for diagnostics of micro-inclusions in the objects of soil and geological origin: validation and practical application

A method for diagnosing microinclusions in the objects of soil and geological origin is developed on the basis of the Atlas of microinclusions in soils (hereinafter referred to as the Atlas). The validation procedure and an example of the practical application of the developed technique are considered. A review of the content and structure of the Atlas, which contains 37 types of microinclusions is presented. Diagnosis of microinclusions is carried out using the Atlas key which is a sequence of identifying diagnostic features (transparency, shape, color, gloss, fracture, structure, as well as density, magnetic properties, hardness, brittleness) for different types of microinclusions. A scheme for determining the nature of a microinclusion (red brick) using the Atlas key is given as an example. The validation procedure of this method consists in experimental verification of the reliability of testing and evaluation of the reproducibility of test results under different conditions: when examining samples of various complexity by several performers at different times using different stereo microscopes. We used 17 soil samples that were previously (2 – 8 years ago) tested and stored as control samples in a laboratory collection of site-collected samples. One part of the samples was examined in usual forensic soil examinations, the other was studied in the framework of participation in the procedure of interlaboratory proficiency testing under the ENFSI (European Network of Forensic Science Institutions). Two experts performed independent studies of control samples at different times. It is shown that the composition of the complex of microinclusions (by type and number) in each of the studied samples coincides with the composition of the corresponding control sample. The experts performed 108 tests, and there were no erroneous results which indicates the reproducibility of the test results and the competence of the experts. An example of the practical application of the developed technique is given.

1. Rozanov B. G. Soil morphology: textbook for higher school. — Moscow: Akademichesky proekt, 2004. — 432 p. [in Russian].

2. Gerasimova M. I., Stroganova M. N., Mozharova N. V., Prokof’ieva T. V. Anthropogenic soils: genesis, geography, reclamation. — Smolensk: Oikumena, 2003. — 268 p. [in Russian].

3. Prokofyeva T. V., Martynenko I. A., Ivannikov F. A. Classification of Moscow Soils and Parent Materials and Its Possible Inclusion in the Classification System of Russian Soils / Eurasian Soil Sci. 2011. Vol. 44. N 5. P. 561 – 571. DOI: 10.1134/S1064229311050127

4. Kazdym A. A. Technogenic deposits of ancient and modern urbanized territories. — Moscow: Nauka, 2006. — 158 p. [in Russian].

5. Shishov L. L., Tonkonogov V. D., Lebedeva I. I., Gerasimova M. I. Classification and diagnostics of soils in Russia. — Smolensk: Oikumena, 2004. — 342 p. [in Russian].

6. Jin-Ling Yang, Gan-Lin Zhang. Formation, characteristics and ecoenvironmental implications of urban soils — A review / Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2015. Vol. 61. Suppl. 1. P. 30 – 46. DOI: 10.1080/00380768.2015.1035622

7. Sager M. Urban Soils and Road Dust — Civilization Effects and Metal Pollution — A Review / Environments. 2020. Vol. 7. N 11. P. 98 – 105. DOI: 10.3390/environments7110098

8. Kazdym A. A. Archaeological mineralogy. — Moscow: ChP «Skorokhodov», 2010. — 44 p. [in Russian].

9. Stoops G., Marcelino V., Mees F. (Eds.) Interpretation of micromorphological features of soils and regoliths. — Elsevier, 2010. — 623 p. DOI: 10.1016/C2014-0-01728-5

10. Aleksandrovskii A. L., Aleksandrovskaya E. I., Dolgikh A. V., et al. Soils and Cultural Layers of Ancient Cities in the South of European Russia / Eurasian Soil Sci. 2015. Vol. 48. N 11. P. 1171 – 1181. DOI: 10.1134/S1064229315110022

11. Suleymanov R. R., Kungurtsev A. Ya., Protsenko A. S., et al. Morphological properties of soils of archaeological monuments of Ufa city (Republic of Bashkortostan) / Ékobiotekh. 2019. Vol. 2. N 4. P. 462 – 467. DOI: 10.31163/2618-964X-2019-2-4-462-467 [in Russian].

12. Semenova N. V., Tyurikova V. V. On the study of solid foreign soil inclusions in the forensic soil science examination / Kriminalist. Issl. Ob’’ektov Pochv. Biol. Proiskhozhd. 1990. Issue 116. P. 3 – 21 [in Russian].

13. Omel’yanyuk G. G., Alekseev A. A., Voznyi A. P., et al. Forensic investigation of specific formations in objects of soil origin: methodological recommendations. — Moscow: ÉKTs MVD Rossii, 2000. — 32 p. [in Russian].

14. Omel’yanyuk G. G. Forensic soil science examination / Ed. by E. R. Rossinskaya. — Moscow: UNITI-DANA, 2004. — 624 p. [in Russian].

15. Gradusova O. B., Peleneva M. V., Nesterina E. M. Atlas of microinclusions in soils. — Moscow: FBU RFTsSÉ, 2014. — 94 p. [in Russian].

16. Soil science. Part 1. Soil and soil formation / Ed. by V. A. Kovda, B. G. Rozanov. — Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1988. P. 68 – 69 [in Russian].

17. PCAST. Report to the President. Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods. September 2016. http://www.documentcloud.org/documents_3121011-Pcast-Forensic-Science-Report-Final.html

18. Smirnova S. A., Usov A. I., Omel’yanyuk G. G., et al. Practice of accreditation of forensic laboratories of the ministry of justice of Russia on compliance with ISO/MEK 17025 / Teor. Prakt. Sud. Ékspert. 2011. N 2(22). P. 40 – 56 [in Russian].

19. Encyclopedic dictionary of forensic theory. Part II / Ed. by S. A. Smirnova. — Moscow: Ékom, 2012. — 429 p. [in Russian].

20. Omel’yanyuk G. G., Bebeshko G. I., Korol’ S. G. Methodological approaches for assessing the competence of forensic laboratories by interlaboratory proficiency testing / Ékspert. 2011. N 4(24). P. 52 – 62 [in Russian].

21. Gradusova O., Nesterina E. The current status of forensic soil examination in the Russian Federation. In the book: Criminal and environmental soil forensics / Ed. by K. Ritz, L. Dawson, D. Miller. — Dordrecht: Springer, 2009. P. 61 – 73. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9204-6_5

22. Shukan L. A., Sapun V. P., Prokhorova E. A., et al. Features of distribution and variation of solid anthropogenic inclusions in the soils of urban lawns / Vopr. Kriminol. Kriminalist. Sud. Ékspert. 2011. N 2(30). P. 155 – 160 [in Russian].

23. Di Maggio R. M. Geological Analysis of Soil and Anthropogenic Material. Three Case Studies. In the book: Soil in Criminal and Environmental Forensics: Proc. of the Soil Forensics Special, 6th European Academy of Forensic Science Conference, The Hague / Ed by H. Kars, L. van den Eijkel. — Springer International Publishing, 2016. P. 25 – 43. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33115-7_3

24. Gradusova O., Nesterina E. Methodology of Forensic Soil Examination in Russia and a View on the World Standartzation Process. In the book: Soil in Criminal and Environmental Forensics: Proc. of the Soil Forensics Special, 6th European Academy of Forensic Science Conference, The Hague / Ed by H. Kars, L. van den Eijkel. — Springer International Publishing, 2016. P. 121 – 136. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33115-7_8

25.