Validation of the expert methodology «Detection of condensed traces of the gunshot residue containing heavy metal compounds on various objects by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis»

We present and discuss the results of the validation of a forensic qualitative testing technique which consists in the detection of condensed traces of the gunshot residue (GSR) in the form of individual microparticles on the objects under study and their identification by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) using a scanning electron microscope Mira III (Tescan, Czech Republic) equipped with a system of X-ray microanalysis INCA GSR 450 (Oxford Nanoanalysis, Great Britain). The procedure for detecting GSR particles containing heavy metal compounds, systems of their classification and interpretation of test results are described. The suitability of the methodology for solving forensic problems has been confirmed. The validation procedure consists in assessing the reliability by comparing the test results obtained by experts (A and B) in two laboratories at different times using the same device, and in confirming the competence of experts proceeding from the results of blind tests. A standard sample ENFSI GSR PT 2018 A-03-07 is used. Each of the experts determined the number of particles classified as GSR present in control samples taken in a ballistic laboratory during a full-scale experiment: from the hands of the shooter; from the hands of a person who did not shoot; without microparticles (clean stage of an electron microscope). The reliability of the technique is characterized by the index (probability) of correct results of detecting GSR particles in the standard sample of at least 95.8% and by a small proportion of false results (no more than 5.4%). The competence of the experts is proved by the consistent results of «blind» testing of control full-scale samples, containing and not containing GSR particles obtained in different laboratories. The results of the validation indicate the suitability of the method for obtaining reliable and valid information about the presence of GSR particles on the objects under study.

1. Heard B. J. Handbook of Firearms and Ballistics. Examining and Interpreting Forensic Evidence. — Oxford – Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blachwell, 2008. — 402 p.

2. Zeichner A. Recent developments in methods of chemical analysis of firearm-related events / Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003. Vol. 376. N 8. P. 1178 – 1191. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-003-1994-y

3. Krishnan S. S. Detection of Gunshot Residue on the hands by trace element analysis / J. Forensic Sci. 1977. Vol. 22. N 2. P. 26 – 47.

4. Renshaw G. D., Pounds C. A., Pearson E. F. The Quantitative Estimation of Lead, Antimony and Barium in Gunshot Residues by Non-Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry / At. Absorpt. Newsl. 1973. Vol. 12. P. 55.

5. Hoffman C. M. Neutron Activation Analysis for the Detection of Firearm Discharge Residues Collected with Cotton Swabs / J. AOAC Int. 1973. Vol. 56. N 6. P. 1388 – 1390. DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/56.6.1388

6. Standard Practice for Gunshot Residue Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometry — OSAC Proposed Standard, 2020.

7. ASTM E1588-20. Standard Practice for Gunshot Residue Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometry. https://www.astm.org/Standards/E1588.html

8. ENFSI-BPM-GSR-02 (vs. 02). Best Practice Manual for the Forensic Investigation of Gunshot Residue by SEM/EDS. 2021. — 16 p.

9. SWGGSR. Guide for Primer Gunshot Residue Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometry. 2011. — 100 p. Available from http://www.swggsr.org

10. Trimple M. The current status of GSR Examinations / FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. 2011. N 5. P. 24 – 32.

11. Stamouli A., Niewohner L., Larsson M., et al. Survey of gunshot residue prevalence on the hands of individuals from various population groups in and outside Europe / Forensic Chem. 2021. Vol. 23. 100308. DOI: 10.1016/j.forc.2021.100308

12. Brozek-Mucha Z. On the Prevalence of Gunshot Residue in Selected Populations — an Empirical Study Performed with SEM-EDX Analysis / Forensic Sci. Int. 2014. Vol. 237. P. 46 – 52. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.01.020

13. Smirnova S. A., Usov A. I., Omeljanuk G. G., et al. Practice of accreditation of forensic laboratories of the Ministry of Justice of Russia on compliance with ISO/MEK 17025 / Teor. Prakt. Sud. Ékspert. 2011. N 2(22). P. 40 – 56 [in Russian].

14. PCAST. Report to the President — Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods. September 2016. http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3121011-Pcast-Forensic-Science-Report-Final.html (accessed September 2, 2021)

15. Bebeshko G. I., Lyubetskaya I. P., Omel’yanyuk G. G., Usov A. I. Methodological approaches to calculation of the main validation parameters of forensic techniques / Zavod. Lab. Diagn. Mater. 2020. Vol. 86. N 4. P. 66 – 74 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.26896/1028-6861-2020-86-4-66-74

16. Smirnova S. A., Bebeshko G. I., Lyubetskaya I. P., et al. Probability-Based Validation of the Forensic Method «Microscopic Analysis of Textile Fibers» / Teor. Prakt. Sud. Ékspert. 2019. Vol. 14. N 2. P. 92 – 99 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-2-92-99