Application of the slow strain rate test method to assess the tendency of corrosion-resistant steels and alloys to sulfide cracking

The results obtained after tests using the slow strain rate test method (SSRT) to determine the tendency to sulfide stress cracking (SSC) of corrosion-resistant steels of ferritic, austenitic, austenitic-ferritic and martensitic classes as well as aluminum alloy are considered. The selected materials are used in the oil and gas industry and operated in an acidic aqueous environment when saturated with hydrogen sulfide. The deformation rate at the level of 10^–6 sec^–1 is recommended by the NACE TM 0198 standard and was selected during the initial study of these materials (due to low illumination of the SSC results on them) in order to assess the tendency to sulfide stress cracking of corrosion-resistant steels and alloys. In fact, using the promising SSRT method, materials with varying structures are evaluated. The method of stretching with a low deformation rate directly in a corrosive environment has shown its suitability for comparative evaluation of the resistance of steels of various classes to sulfide stress cracking. From the consideration of the tensile curves of the studied materials in a hydrogen sulfide medium, it follows that the destruction of steel samples of grades 08Kh13, 08Kh18N10T, 08Kh22N6T occurs only in the area of plastic deformation, and the destruction of steel samples of grades 17-4PH was noted in the area of elastic deformation on a linear section of the tensile curve. Martensitic class steel 17-4PH showed the greatest sensitivity to the effects of hydrogen sulfide and a threshold stress below the permissible one. Aluminum alloy 1953T1 has not shown a tendency to sulfide cracking (the tensile curves in air and in a hydrogen sulfide medium are almost completely the same) and can be considered as a standard of resistance to this type of corrosion failure. Metallographic analysis of the structure of the studied steels and the nature of the propagation of the formed corrosion cracks allowed us to confirm the influence of the structure, phase composition and strength level of the material on the development of the sulfide stress cracking process.

1. Vagapov R. K. Corrosion destruction of steel equipment and pipelines at gas field facilities in the presence of aggressive components / Metal Technol. 2021. No. 3. P. 47 – 54 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.31044/1684-2499-2021-0-3-47-54

2. Ivanov V. V., Bondarev A. A., Kulbey A. G. Investigation of factors influencing the formation and development of stress corrosion cracking on main gas pipelines / Bull. Polotsk State Univ. Ser. B. Industry. Appl. Sci. 2022. No. 3. P. 95 – 102 [in Russian].

3. Pumpyansky D. A., Pyshmintsev I. Yu., Maltseva A. N., et al. Structure and properties of steel for the production of high-strength pipes of the oil and gas range in hydrogen sulfide resistant design / Metallurg. 2022. No. 10. P. 8 – 13 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.52351/00260827_2022_10_8

4. Laptev A. B., Dzhumabaev Kh. K., Golubev I. A., et al. The main causes of stress corrosion cracking of main pipelines / Probl. Ferr. Metallurgy Mater. Sci. 2022. No. 3. P. 41 – 51 [in Russian].

5. Alkhimenko A. A., Shemyakinskiy B. A., Kharkov A. A., Shaposhnikov N. O. Development of the methodology of accelerated testing of oil-gas pipe steels for stress corrosion cracking / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2020. Vol. 86. No. 9. P. 70 – 76 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.26896/1028-6861-2020-86-9-70-76

6. Kushnarenko V. M. Assessment and forecasting of the operability of metals and alloys of equipment operating under the influence of corrosive media / Bull. Orenburg State Univ. 2007. No. 1. P. 134 – 140 [in Russian].

7. Kadyrbekov B. A., Kolesnikov V. A., Pechersky V. N. Assessment of the resistance of steels to corrosion cracking during tests with a constant deformation rate / Phys.-Chem. Mech. Mater. 1989. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 39 – 60 [in Russian].

8. Hoey G. R., Revie R. W., Ramsingh R. R. Comparison of the slow strain rate technique and the NACE TM0177/sup (1)/ tensile test for determining sulfide stress cracking resistance / Mater. Perfom. 1987. Vol. 26. No. 10. P. 42 – 45.

9. Abramova M. G., Goncharov A. A., Nikitin Ya. Yu. Study of the corrosion resistance of aluminum alloy AMg6 and steel 12Kh18N10T in conditions of loading under the impact of environmental factors / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2021. Vol. 87. No. 6. P. 33 – 40 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.26896/1028-6861-2021-87-6-33-40

10. Ogawa Y., Takakuwa O., Okazaki S., et al. Pronounced transition of crack initiation and propagation modes in the hydrogen-related failure of a Ni-based superalloy 718 under internal and external hydrogen conditions / Corrosion Sci. 2019. Vol. 161. P. 1 – 9. DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2019.108186

11. Shvetsov O. V., Alfimov A. D., Ermakov B. S., Kondratiev S. Yu. The influence of microstructure on the nature of fracture and fatigue properties of drill pipes made of aluminum alloys 1953T1 and D16T / Metalloved. Term. Obrab. Met. 2024. No. 3. P. 20 – 26 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.30906/mitom.2024.3.20-26

12. Alkhimenko A. A. Improvement of the test method for corrosion cracking of pipe steels for oil and gas purposes in aggressive gas environments. Author’s abstract of candidate’s thesis. — St. Petersburg, 2022. — 17 p. [in Russian].

13. Kondratiev S. Yu., Alkhimenko A. A., Kharkov A. A., et al. Criteria for accelerated assessment of the tendency of pipe steels to corrosion cracking in oil production conditions / Metalloved. Term. Obrab. Met. 2021. Vol. 63. P. 9 – 10 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.30906/mitom.2021.10.16-22

14. Kharkov A. A., Shaposhnikov N. O., Alekseeva E. L. Corrosion resistance of steels and alloys in the conditions of extraction and transportation of natural gas, oil and hydrogen gas: monograph. — St. Petersburg: Politekh-press: Pervyi IPKh, 2024. — 253 p [in Russian].

15. Alkhimenko A. A., Davydov A. D., Khar’kov A. A., et al. Methods of corrosion testing used for development and commercial exploitation of new shipbuilding steels and alloys. Review. Part II. Corrosion cracking and field marine tests / Izv. Vuzov. Chern. Metallurgiya. 2022. Vol. 65. No. 3. P. 48 – 56. [in Russian]. DOI: 10.17073/0368-0797-2022-1-48-56

16. Vagapov R. K. Study of hydrogenation and corrosion of steel equipment and pipelines at the production facilities of H2S-containing hydrocarbon raw materials / Vopr. Materialoved. 2021. Vol. 106. P. 170 – 181 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.22349/1994-6716-2021-106-2-170-181

17. Pyshmintsev I. Yu., Gizatullin A. B., Devyaterikova N. A., et al. Preliminary assessment of X52 large-diameter pipes suitability for transportation of pressurized pure gaseous hydrogen / Izv. Vuzov. Chern. Metallurgiya. 2023. Vol. 66. P. 35 – 42 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.17073/0368-0797-2023-1-35-42

18. Devyaterikova N. A., Lev K. A., Tsvetkov A. S., Dagaev S. E. Brief description of methods for assessing the compatibility of steels of grades Kh52 and Kh70 with hydrogen and test results of TBD / Ferr. Metals. 2024. No. 2. P. 32 – 38 [in Russian].

19. Archakov Yu. I. Hydrogen resistance of steel. — Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1978. — 120 p. [in Russian].

20. Sokol I. Ya., Ulyanin E. A., Feldgandler E. G. Structure and corrosion of metals and alloys. — Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1989. — 400 p. [in Russian].