On the mechanical anisotropy of direct laser deposited 316L stainless steel workpieces
https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2025-91-10-81-87
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to evaluate the mechanical anisotropy of structures additively manufactured from heat-resistant steels under conditions where the dimensions of the workpiece do not allow cutting samples in three mutually perpendicular directions. The material for this research was cylindrical specimens from SS 316L alloy plates prepared through direct laser deposition with process parameters, providing mechanical properties of large-scale structures. The quasi-static isothermal tension tests up to fracture under room temperature and elevated temperatures carried out on specimens extracted along two possible orientations (namely: the build direction and the print direction) shown the similarity of the flow curves in these directions, which might be associated with the small degree of mechanical anisotropy of the workpiece. In contrast, the cross-section of the round bar specimen after tension becomes elliptical — both in the necking part of the specimen and in the part of uniform elongation, which demonstrates the persistence of anisotropy in the workpieces related with the difference of mechanical properties in the third, unstudied direction. On the basis of numerical simulation of the specimen’s deformation via finite element method in the ANSYS package a mathematical description of the material was constructed, providing coincidence of the simulated behavior with the experimental one — both in the load-elongation curve and in the cross-section ellipticity of the specimen. Typical for additive manufacturing method thermally stressed structure was numerically simulated to estimate the influence of the material anisotropy on structural strength. It is shown that taking into account anisotropy reduces the assessed cyclic durability by approximately two times. The performed work gives a reason for a more complete study of anisotropy, despite the methodological difficulties, such as manufacturing of sufficiently large 3D-printed workpieces, and additional amount of experimental work.
Keywords
About the Authors
S. P. SamoilovRussian Federation
Sergey P. Samoilov.
76, prosp. Lenina, Chelyabinsk, 454080.
A. O. Chernyavsky
Russian Federation
Alexander O. Chernyavsky.
76, prosp. Lenina, Chelyabinsk, 454080.
S. Yu. Ivanov
Russian Federation
Sergey Yu. Ivanov.
3, Lotsmanskaya ul., St. Petersburg, 190121.
References
1. Zhang C., Juul Jensen D., Yu T. Effects of initial 3D printed microstructures on subsequent microstructural evolution in 316L stainless steel / Acta Mater. 2023. Vol. 242. 118481. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118481
2. Shorstov S. Yu., Marakhovsky P. S., Pakhomkin S. I., Razmakhov M. G. Study of the thermophysical properties of heat-resistant intermetallic titanium γ-alloy obtained using methods of shaped casting and additive technologies / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2022. Vol. 88. No. 9. P. 28 – 34 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.26896/1028-6861-2022-88-9-28-34
3. Leonteva Yu. O. Comparison of the strength and structural properties of the specimens made of EOS PH1 stainless steel of additive manufacturing and 30KhGSA hardened steel of traditional production / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2022. Vol. 88. No. 7. P. 63 – 72 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.26896/1028-6861-2022-88-7-63-72
4. Dvoretskov R. M., Slavin A. V., Tikhonov M. M., Kuko I. S. Control of the chemical composition of heat-resistant nickel alloys upon manufacturing products from these alloys using additive technologies / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2021. Vol. 87. No. 4. P. 71 – 80 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.26896/1028-6861-2021-87-4-71-80
5. Mikhaylova N. A., Kosarina E. I., Demidov A. A., Suvorov P. V. Radiation control of blanks manufactured using additive technology by digital radiography / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2022. Vol. 88. No. 10. P. 48 – 53 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.26896/1028-6861-2022-88-10-48-53
6. Gorunov A. I. Directional crystallization of 316L stainless steel specimens by direct laser cladding / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2018. Vol. 84. No. 1(I). P. 29 – 35 [in Russian]. DOI: 10.26896/1028-6861-2018-84-1-I-29-35
7. Margerit P., Weisz-Patrault D., Ravi-Chandar K., Constantinescu A. Tensile and ductile fracture properties of as-printed 316L stainless steel thin walls obtained by directed energy deposition / Additive Manufact. 2020. 101664. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101664
8. Yin Y., Tan Q., Bermingham M., et al. Laser additive manufacturing of steels / Int. Mater. Rev. 2022. Vol. 67. Issue 5. P. 487 – 573. DOI: 10.1080/09506608.2021.1983351
9. Turichin G. A., Sklyar M. O., Babkin K. D., et al. Direct laser deposition is a breakthrough in the production of large-sized structures / Scientific-publicistic Internet article [in Russian]. https://additiv-tech.ru/publications/pryamoe-lazernoe-vyrashchivanie-proryv-v-izgotovlenii-krupnogabaritnyh-izdeliy.html (accessed 04/14/2024).
10. Eliseeva O. V., Belyaev N. D. Technology of Direct Laser Growth of Elements of Seal Assembly of Steroid Device / Orig. Issl. (ORIS) = Orig. Res. (ORES). 2023. No. 3. P. 243 – 250 [in Russian]. https://ores.su/media/filer_public/1e/db/1edb4b01-1593-4164-8570-e931acab68c8/243-250.pdf
11. Gradl P., Tinker D. C., Park A., et al. Robust Metal Additive Manufacturing Process Selection and Development for Aerospace Components / J. Mater. Eng. Performance. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11665-022-06850-0
12. Ivanov S., Mendagaliev R., Samoilov S., et al. Temperature dependence of tensile mechanical properties and work hardening behavior in direct laser deposited austenitic stainless steel 316L / Mater. Today Comm. 2024. Vol. 39. 108613. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108613
13. Esmaeilpour A., Abedi H. R., Mirzaei A., Habibiyan A. Constructing the high temperature efficiency and instability maps of selective laser melted 316L stainless steel through artificial neural network modeling / J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022. No. 18. P. 4578 – 4589. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.116
14. Kazantseva N., Koemets Y., Davydov D., et al. Analysis of unstable plastic flow in the porous 316L samples manufactured with a laser 3D printer / Materials. 2023. No. 16. 0014. DOI: 10.3390/ma16010014
15. Güden M., Enser S., Bayhan M., et al. The strain rate sensitive flow stresses and constitutive equations of a selective-laser-melt and an annealed-rolled 316L stainless steel: a comparative study / Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2022. No. 838. 142743. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.142743
16. Lu Q., Zhang C., Wang W., et al. Reveal the viscoplastic behaviour and microstructure evolution of stainless steel 316L / Materials. 2022. No. 15. 7064. DOI: 10.3390/ma15207064
17. Pelegatti M., Lanzutti A., Salvati E., et al. Cyclic plasticity and low cycle fatigue of an AISI 316L stainless steel: experimental evaluation of material parameters for durability design / Materials. 2021. No. 14. 3588. DOI: 10.3390/ma14133588
18. El-Tahawy M., Jenei P., Kolonits T., et al. Different evolutions of the microstructure, texture, and mechanical performance during tension and compression of 316L stainless steel / Metallurg. Mater. Trans. A. 2020. Vol. 51. Issue 7. P. 3447 – 3460. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-020-05782-5
19. Chen G., Zhang X., Zhong J., et al. New inverse method for determining uniaxial flow properties by spherical indentation test / Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2021. No. 34. 94. DOI: 10.1186/s10033-021-00617-9
20. Hill R. A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals / Proc. Roy. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 1948. Vol. 193. Issue 1033. P. 281 – 297. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1948.0045
21. Vaulin S. D. Research, development and production of the demo-stands of technologies for a single-stage reusable vertical start and landing launch vehicle / South Ural State University’s Scientific Developments. Almanac. — Chelyabinsk: SUSU Publishing Center, 2023. P. 20 – 21 [in Russian]. https://www.susu.ru/sites/default/files/files/Альманах2022_собранный_новый_compressed.pdf (accessed 04/14/2024).
Review
For citations:
Samoilov S.P., Chernyavsky A.O., Ivanov S.Yu. On the mechanical anisotropy of direct laser deposited 316L stainless steel workpieces. Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials. 2025;91(10):81-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2025-91-10-81-87






























