Preview

Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials

Advanced search

INTERLABORATORY COMPARISONS AS EVIDENCE BASE FOR THE COMPETENCE OF LABORATORIES

https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2018-84-2-70-72

Abstract

In the article the questions connected with current requirements of test laboratories in terms of proficiency test by interlaboratory comparison (comparative) the test (PT) were considered. The comparability of international and Russian approaches in the choice of periodicity and the principle of the formation of a plan for the participation of accredited laboratories in proficiency testing given the scope of the accreditation area, examples of documents of the accreditation bodies international accreditation system ILAC and the national accreditation body of the Federal service for accreditation is shown. Highlighted the importance of PT in the quality control of test results, especially for those laboratories which are involved in study of products exported to various countries, including those which included in the Register of certification bodies and testing laboratories (centers) of the Customs Union carrying out assessment of conformity of products to requirements of technical regulations of the Eurasian economic Union (Customs Union). Attention is drawn to the options for the organization of proficiency testing providers of PT, or of participating laboratories, as well as the possibility of using the results of the comparison in practice of laboratories to assess their competence by accreditation bodies, but also in the everyday practice of quality management and evidence of the effectiveness of the quality management system.

About the Authors

S. V. Kreynin
Saint Petersburg Institute for management and food technologies
Russian Federation


S. V. Kreynin
JSC «Good expert practice»
Russian Federation

Sergey V. Kreynin

Moscow



O. I. Ponomareva
Saint Petersburg Institute for management and food technologies
Russian Federation


References

1. EA-4/18. Guidance on the level and frequency of proficiency testing participation, 2010. URL: http://www.european-accreditation.org/publication/ea-4-18-inf-rev00-june-2010-rev (accessed 05.12.2017).

2. The policy of the Russian accreditation regarding the testing of qualifications through interlaboratory comparative. Approved by the Head of the Federal Service for Accreditation on October 28, 2016. URL: http://fsa.gov.ru/index/staticview/id/444 (accessed 05.12.2017) [in Russian].

3. RF State Standard GOST ISO/IEC 17025:2005. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. — Moscow: Standartinform, 2012. — 62 p. [in Russian].

4. The order of Ministry of economic development dated 30 May 2014 No. 326 «On approving the accreditation Criteria, the list of documents confirming compliance of the applicant, the accredited person to accreditation criteria and list of documents in the field of standardization, compliance with which applicants, accredited person and ensures their compliance with the accreditation criteria» [in Russian].

5. RF State Standard GOST R 8.690–2009 (ILAC-G22:2004). State system for ensuring the uniformity of measurements. Use of proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons for accreditation in testing. — Moscow: Standartinform, 2010. — 16 p. [in Russian].


Review

For citations:


Kreynin S.V., Kreynin S.V., Ponomareva O.I. INTERLABORATORY COMPARISONS AS EVIDENCE BASE FOR THE COMPETENCE OF LABORATORIES. Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials. 2018;84(2):70-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2018-84-2-70-72

Views: 1295


ISSN 1028-6861 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0187 (Online)