Determination of the reactivity of cellulosic substrates towards enzymatic hydrolysis

An ever-growing scientific interest in the development of effective methods for transformation of various cellulosic resources into fermentable sugars necessitates development of a universal procedure for determination of the reactivity of cellulosic substrates towards enzymatic hydrolysis. The practical significance consists in maximum accessibility of the procedure for the labs of pilot-production enterprises engaged in testing and scaling up the biotech processes. The developed procedure fully complies with modern requirements and relies on measuring the concentration of reducing sugars (spectrophotometry and HPLC) in the enzymatic hydrolyzates obtained from pre-prepared substrates, the biocatalysis being run by a cocktail composed of available CelluLuxe-A and BrewZyme-BGX. On top of that, the procedure implies gravimetric analysis of the solid residues after hydrolysis of substrates. Cellulosic biomasses can usually be fermented for control without any pretreatment, however, commercial celluloses can be used as well. The use of the developed procedure is shown to provide prompt and high-quality assessment of the reactivity of a series of chosen substrates to enzymatic hydrolysis. In contrast to the methods of enzymatic hydrolysis discussed in literature for evaluation of the enzyme efficiency, the developed procedure allows arranging of chosen cellulosic raw materials in a descending order of their reactivity to hydrolysis using the same multi-enzyme cocktail and, moreover can demonstrate dependence of the reactivity of substrates on the pretreatment method. The results can be presented as a dependence of the concentration (yield) of reducing sugars on the duration of enzymatic hydrolysis of the substrate, and also in the form of the calculated hydrolysis rates, final yields of reducing sugars including pentoses, content of glucose component of reducing substances and decrease in mass. The procedure was repeatedly tested on a wide range of cellulosic substrates and provided reliable results regarding evaluation of their reactivity and forecasting of the scale-up results of enzymatic hydrolysis, including that in aqueous medium when preparing nutrient broths for microbiological synthesis.

cellulose-containing substrate, procedure, reactivity, enzymatic hydrolysis, reducing sugars, glucose, xylose, spectrophotometry, HPLC

1. Chen B., Zhao B., Li M., et al. Fractionation of rapeseed straw by hydrothermal/dilute acid pretreatment combined with alkali post-treatment for improving its enzymatic hydrolysis / Biores. Technol. 2017. Vol. 225. P. 127 – 133.

2. Sills D. L., Gossett J. M. Using FTIR to predict saccharification from enzymatic hydrolysis of alkali-pretreated biomasses / Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012. Vol. 109. N 2. P. 353 – 362.

3. Alvira P., Tomбs-Pejу E., Ballesteros M., et al. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: A review / Biores. Technol. 2010. Vol. 101. N 13. P. 4851 – 4861.

4. Li K., Wan J., Wang X., et al. Comparison of dilute acid and alkali pretreatments in production of fermentable sugars from bamboo: Effect of Tween 80 / Industrial Crops and Products. 2016. Vol. 83. P. 414 – 422.

5. Sun S., Sun S., Cao X., et al. The role of pretreatment in improving the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials / Biores. Technol. 2016. Vol. 199. P. 49 – 58.

6. Van Dyk J. S., Pletschke B. I. A review of lignocellulose bioconversion using enzymatic hydrolysis and synergistic cooperation between enzymes — factors affecting enzymes, conversion and synergy / Biotechnol. Adv. 2012. Vol. 30. N 6. P. 1458 – 1480.

7. Gama M. Bacterial NanoCellulose from Biotechnology to Bio-Economy. — N.Y.: Elsevier, 2016. — 240 p.

8. Sakovich G. V., Skiba E. A., Budaeva V. V., et al. Technological fundamentals of bacterial nanocellulose production from zero prime-cost feedstock / Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2017. Vol. 477. P. 357 – 359.

9. Baram G. I. Progress in microcolumn high-performance liquid chromatography and its application to solve complex analytical problems. Doctoral thesis. — Irkutsk, 1997. — 56 p. [in Russian].

10. Obolenskaya A. V., Elnitskaya Z. P., Leonovich A. A. Laboratory Works on Wood and Cellulose Chemistry. — Moscow: Йkologiya, 1991. — 320 p. [in Russian].

11. State standard GOST 6840–78. Cellulose. Method for determination of alpha-cellulose. — Moscow: Izd. standartov, 1984. — 6 p. [in Russian].

12. State standard GOST 10820–75. Cellulose. Method for determination of pentosans. — Moscow: Izd. standartov, 1975. — 7 p. [in Russian].

13. Interstate standard GOST 18461–93. Cellulose. Method for quantification of ash. — Moscow: IPK Izd. standartov, 1995. — 8 p. [in Russian].

14. State standard GOST 25438–82. Dissolving cellulose. Methods for determination of intrinsic viscosity. — Moscow: Izd. standartov, 1982. — 20 p. [in Russian].

15. Thygesen A., Oddershede J., Lilholt H., et al. On the determination of crystallinity and cellulose content in plant fibres / Cellulose. 2005. Vol. 12. N 6. P. 563 – 576.

16. Gusakov A. V., Kondratyeva E. G., Sinitsyn A. P. Comparison of two methods for assaying reducing sugars in the determination of carbohydrase activities / Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2011. Vol. 2011. P. 283658.

17. Veshnyakov V. A., Habarov Yu. G., Kamakina N. D. Comparison of reducing compounds determination methods: Bertrand’s method, ebulliostatical and photometrical methods / Khim. Rastit. Syr’ya. 2008. N 4. P. 47 – 50 [in Russian].

18. Fedorova G. A., Kozhanova L. A., Azarova I. N. Application of microcolumn high-performance liquid chromatography in medicine. Part II / Vestn. Vosstanovit. Med. 2008. N 2(24). P. 47 – 50 [in Russian].

19. Budaeva V. V., Makarova E. I., Skiba E. A., et al. Enzymatic hydrolysis of the products of hydro-thermobaric processing of Miscanthus and oat hulls / Catalysis in Industry. 2013. Vol. 5. N 4. P. 335 – 341.

20. Makarova E. I., Budaeva V. V., Skiba E. A., et al. Enzymatic hydrolysis of celluloses obtained via the hydrothermal processing of Miscanthus and oat hulls / Catalysis in Industry. 2014. Vol. 6. N 1. P. 67 – 71.

21. Denisova M. N., Makarova E. I., Pavlov I. N., et al. Enzymatic hydrolysis of hydrotropic pulp at different substrate concentrations / Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016. Vol. 178. N 6. P. 1196 – 1206.

22. Tarabanko V. E., Kaygorodov K. L., Skiba E. A., et al. Processing pine wood into vanillin and glucose by sequential catalytic oxidation and enzymatic hydrolysis / J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2017. Vol. 37. N 1. P. 43 – 51.

23. Skiba E. A., Baibakova O. V., Budaeva V. V., et al. Pilot technology of ethanol production from oat hulls for subsequent conversion to ethylene / Chem. Eng. J. 2017. Vol. 329. P. 178 – 186.

24. Makarova E. I., Budaeva V. V., Kukhlenko A. A., et al. Enzyme kinetics of cellulose hydrolysis of miscanthus and oat hulls / 3 Biotech. 2017. Vol. 7. P. 317.

25. Budaeva V. V., Makarova E. I., Skiba E. A., et al. A study of acid and enzymatic hydrolyses of rape straw pellets / Polzunov. Vestn. 2013. N 3. P. 173 – 179 [in Russian].

26. Shcherbakova T. P., Udoratina E. V., Makarova E. I., et al. The effect of mechano-chemical stimuli on the enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency of lignocellulosic feedstocks / Polzunov. Vestn. 2013. N 3. P. 224 – 230 [in Russian].

27. De Bhowmick G., Sarmah A. K., Sen R. Lignocellulosic biorefinery as a model for sustainable development of biofuels and value added products / Biores. Technol. 2018. Vol. 247. P. 1144 – 1154.

28. Aleshina L. A., Lyuhanova I. V., Budaeva V. V., et al. X-ray diffraction analysis results for non-woody celluloses / Uch. Zap. Petrozavod. Gos. Univ. 2011. N 8(121). P. 114 – 117 [in Russian].

29. Hu F., Ragauskas A. Pretreatment and Lignocellulosic Chemistry / BioEnergy Res. 2012. Vol. 5. N 4. P. 1043 – 1066.