Preview

Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Study of the correlation between Rockwell and Vickers hardness

https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2026-92-2-68-72

Abstract

Hardness measurement of metallic materials at its high levels is usually performed using Rockwell (HRC) or Vickers (HV) methods. The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlation between Rockwell and Vickers hardness values. Analysis of technique gives the following general formula: HV = (A/(B – HRC))2. This formula describes well the high hardness region at A = 4400 MPa1/2 and B = 110. Comparison with the tables of ASTM A370-20 and ASTM E140-12b standards yields A = 4700 MPa1/2 and B = 117. In both cases the formulae tend to the borders of the scatter band of available data. The relative middle of the scatter band corresponds to A = 4500 MPa1/2 and B = 113. The difference between the three relationships increases with increasing hardness and reaches four units at the level of 70 HRC. This means that numeric values of the A and B coefficients are to be determined more specifically for separate groups of materials. Obtained results can be used for improvement of the technique of determination of hardness of metallic materials and for comparison of the values of hardness determined by different methods.

About the Authors

K. Yu. Yu. Okishev
The first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin Ural Federal University
Russian Federation

Konstantin Yu. Okishev

19, ul. Mira, Yekaterinburg, 620062



A. S. Sozykina
South Ural State University
Russian Federation

Anna S. Sozykina

76, prosp. Lenina, Chelyabinsk, 454080



References

1. Zolotorevskiy V. S. Mechanical properties of metals. — Moscow: MISiS, 1998. — 398 p. [in Russian].

2. Pavlina E. J., Van Tyne C. J. Correlation of yield strength and tensile strength with hardness for steels / J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2008. Vol. 17. No. 6. P. 888 – 893. DOI: 10.1007/s11665-008-9225-5

3. Sandomirskiy S. G. Generalized correlations between tensile strength of steels and their hardness / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2017. Vol. 83. No. 11. P. 52 – 57 [in Russian].

4. Matyunin V. M., Dubov A. A., Marchenkov A. Yu. Scale factor in determination of hardness of metallic materials / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2009. Vol. 75. No 9. P. 59 – 62 [in Russian].

5. Matyunin V. M. Size effect and its impact on mechanical properties of materials / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2012. Vol. 78. No. 2. P. 64 – 68 [in Russian].

6. Dvornik M. I., Ershova T. B., Mikhailenko E. A., Krutikova V. O. Peculiarities of determination of hardness and crack resistance of cemented carbides at various impression loads on the pyramid / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2017. Vol. 83. No. 9. P. 57 – 65 [in Russian].

7. Vasileva M. V., Pesin V. A., Osmakov A. S., Shamshurin A. I. Investigation of the character of dependence of WC – Co alloys on size distribution of WC grains / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2023. Vol. 89. No. 2. Part I. P. 45 – 49 [in Russian].

8. Polyakov B. N. Statistical validity of relationship between the methods of measuring hardness of metals and alloys / Industr. Lab. Mater. Diagn. 2005. Vol. 71. No. 12. P. 42 – 43 [in Russian].

9. Mott B. W. Micro-indentation hardness testing. — London: Butterworths Scientific Publications, 1956.

10. Hardness conversions for hardened steel: tentative values suggested by Committee E-1, A. S. T. M. / Metal Progr. 1944. Vol. 45. No. 3. P. 502B.

11. Grigorovich V. K. Hardness and microhardness of metals. — Moscow: Nauka, 1976. — 230 p. [in Russian].

12. Shaposhnikov N. A. Mechanical testing of metals. — Moscow – Leningrad: Mashgiz, 1954. — 444 p. [in Russian].

13. Physical metallurgy and heat treatment of steel: a handbook. — Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1991. — 462 p. [in Russian].

14. Slavina N. P. On the tables for mutual conversion of hardness numbers / Izmerit. Tekhn. 1958. No. 6. P. 27 – 29 [in Russian].

15. Wever F., Rose A., Peter W., et al. Atlas zur Wärmebehandlung der Stähle. — Düsseldorf: Verlag Stahleisen m.b.H., 1961.

16. Dondik I. G. Mechanical testing of metals. — Kiev: AN SSSR, 1962. — 228 p. [in Russian].

17. Tylkin M. A. Heat-treater’s handbook in repair service. — Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1981. — 648 p. [in Russian].

18. GOST 21354–87. Cylindrical evolvent gears of external engagement. Strength calculation. — Moscow: Izd. standartov, 1987. — 128 p. [in Russian].

19. Zhuravlev V. N., Nikolaeva O. I. Machine-building steels: a handbook. — Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1992. — 480 p. [in Russian].

20. ASTM E140-12be1. Standard hardness conversion tables for metals. Relationship among Brinell hardness, Vickers hardness, Rockwell hardness, superficial hardness, Knoop hardness, scleroscope hardness, and Leeb hardness. — ASTM International, 2017. — 25 p.

21. ASTM A370-20. Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products. — ASTM International, 2020. — 50 p.

22. Leckie-Ewing P. A study of the microhardness of the major carbides in some high speed steels / Trans. Am. Soc. Met. 1952. Vol. 44. P. 348 – 366.

23. Rozanov A. N. Effect of carbon and quenching temperature on the hardness of martensite / Dokl. AN SSSR. 1957. Vol. 115. No. 4. P. 721 – 722 [in Russian].

24. Popov V. S., Brykov N. N., Dmitrichenko N. S., Pristupa P. G. Durability of equipment in refractories production. — Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1978. — 232 p. [in Russian].


Review

For citations:


Yu. Okishev K.Yu., Sozykina A.S. Study of the correlation between Rockwell and Vickers hardness. Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials. 2026;92(2):68-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2026-92-2-68-72

Views: 347

JATS XML

ISSN 1028-6861 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0187 (Online)